Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted Poisson regression analyses for provision of high-quality of PITC and domain-specific of facility readiness (Model 3, 4, 5, and 6)

From: Does facility readiness promote high-quality of provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling to pregnant women? A national survey for improving policy of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Tanzania

Variable

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

 

β (Robust SE)

β (Robust SE)

β (Robust SE)

β (Robust SE)

Facility readiness score

 Score

0.080 (0.041)*

0.165 (0.041)**

0.104 (0.040)**

0.168 (0.048)**

Managing authority (ref. Public)

 Private

− 0.144 (0.081)*

− 0.097 (0.072)*

− 0.175 (0.083)**

− 0.175 (0.084)**

Facility type (ref. Clinic/dispensary)

 Health center

0.020 (0.058)

0.032 (0.054)

− 0.041 (0.063)

0.030 (0.058)

 Hospital

0.038 (0.072)

0.068 (0.071)

− 0.035 (0.077)

0.023 (0.075)

Quality assurance (ref. Not performed < 1 year)

 Performed < 1 year

0.033 (0.066)

0.027 (0.064)

0.012 (0.069)

0.027 (0.064)

Cadre (ref. Nurses)

 Clinicians

0.212 (0.131)*

0.200 (0.121)*

0.181 (0.134)*

0.238 (0.128)*

 Age (ref. < 20 years)

 20–35 years

0.053 (0.051)*

0.053 (0.050)*

0.064 (0.050)*

0.059 (0.048)*

 > 35 years

0.049 (0.063)*

0.055 (0.062)*

0.059 (0.062)*

0.043 (0.062)*

  1. Model 3 for the domain of “Staff and training”
  2. Model 4 for the domain of “Equipment”
  3. Model 6 for the domain of “Diagnostics”
  4. Model 5 for the domain of “Medicines and commodities”
  5. * = p < 0.2, ** = p < 0.05